Employee Performance Analysis Through Motivation and the Work Environment at Patra Semarang Hotel & Convention

Main Article Content

Ray Octafian
Krisnawati

Abstract

This research was conducted at the Patra Semarang Hotel & Convention. This research was based on a pre-survey of 20 employees of the Patra Semarang Hotel & Convention, where there were two variables that had been in the spotlight in employee performance, namely motivation and work environment. The purpose of this research is to analyze and also determine the performance of employees of Patra Semarang Hotel & Convention through motivation and work environment during the last few months. In this study, using a quantitative approach, the research data was obtained through distributing questionnaires after which the data were analyzed with the help of the SPSS 25. 0 for windows program. The questionnaire data was adjusted to the number of samples in the study, namely 100 respondents, samples were selected using Accidental Sampling technique. The adjusted R² value from the analysis of SPSS 25. 0 for windows is 0.631 which means that 63.1% of employee performance is influenced by motivation and work environment, on the contrary 36.9% is influenced by other variables outside the variables studied. From the results of this study are expected to provide suggestions and steps that must be taken, especially for management and in general for employees of the Patra Semarang Hotel & Convention.

Article Details

How to Cite
OctafianR., & NugraheniK. S. (2021). Employee Performance Analysis Through Motivation and the Work Environment at Patra Semarang Hotel & Convention. Nusantara Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 101-105. Retrieved from https://lekantara.com/journal/index.php/njsh/article/view/19
Section
Articles

References

1. Ghozali, Imam. (2009) Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program SPSS. Semarang: BP UNDIP.
2. Gomes, F. Cardosa. (2003) Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Yogyakarta. Andi Offset.
3. Grifin, RW 2003. MANAJEMEN. Jakarta. Erlangga.
4. Mangkunegara, Anwar P. (2006) Evaluasi kinerja sumber daya manusia. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
5. Octafian, R., & Palupiningtyas, D. (2019) Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kepuasan wisatawan (studi kasus water blaster Semarang). Jurnal Manajemen STIE Muhammadiyah Palopo. https://doi.org/10.35906/jm001.v5i2.362
6. Polakit, R., Sendow, GM, & Lumintang, GG (2016) Pengaruh kepemimpinan, kompensasi dan lingkungan kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan PT Asuransi Wahana Tata Manado. EMBA Journal, 4 (3), 1068–1077.
7. Prihantoro, A. (2012) Peningkatan kinerja sumber daya manusia melalui motivasi, disiplin, lingkungan kerja dan komitmen. Scientific Journal of Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics, University of Muhammadiyah Semarang, 8 (2), 78–98.
8. Rivai, Veithzal. (2004) Manajemen sumber daya manusia untuk perusahaan dari teori ke praktek. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada
9. Robbins, Stephen, P. (2003) Prinsip-prinsip perilaku organisasi. Jakarta: Erlangga
10. Setyaningrum, K., & Hujianto, L. (2018) Studi analisis kinerja karyawan century healthcare JATENG DIY. Jurnal Visi Manajemen, 3(1).
11. Wulandari, A. (2014) Pengaruh kualitas pelayanan terhadap kepuasan pasien dengan perceived mediasi pada RSUD Dr. Moewardi di Surakarta.19–27. Available at: https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:QcZUvV6bMUcJ:https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/79471-ID-p Impact-kuality-pelayanan-terhadap-kep.pdf+&cd= 2 & hl = en & ct = clnk & gl = id
12. Yulianto, Eko. (2011) Pengaruh motivasi kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan pada PT Tunas Abadi Makmur (TAM) divisi Sony Xperia Surabaya. 11 (2), 10. https://doi.org/10.16194/j.cnki.31-1059/g4.2011.07.016